No winners in a war

War only defeats humanity.

The first victim of war is love.

The first deserters of war are truth and justice.

The first victory of war belongs to Satan.

A war won by injustice is just a step towards the next one.

Peace is never won by defeat.

Nobody ever wins a war, except Satan.

Those are not fortune-cookie lines:

4 concurrent conditions for a just war

1. Lasting and certain grave damage by an aggressor

2. Last resort after all peaceful means fail

3. Serious prospects of success

4. Proportionality (the war must not produce greater evil than it eliminates)

War on Iran doesn’t even meet even one of those conditions!

Preemptive strike

The preemptive strike doctrine is an obvious lame excuse to try to hide the real perpetrator. It’s immoral and anti-Christian.

Antiwar.com: “Neither the US nor Israel acknowledges the existence of Israel’s nuclear weapons program … Since the Nixon administration, the US and Israel have maintained an understanding under which Washington does not acknowledge Israel’s nuclear weapons program or pressure Israel to sign the NPT. The ambiguity has allowed the US presidents to provide military assistance without worrying about the 1976 Symington Amendment, a foreign assistance law that prohibits aid to countries that traffic in or receive nuclear enrichment equipment or technology outside of international safeguards.”

With abundant oil, it’s clear that Iran doesn’t need nuclear energy and was using it to get enough plutonium for a-bombs.

All their civilian-use excuses fall when considering that oil-energy is cheaper than nuclear. Also, military-strategic energy diversification makes no sense: Iran has proven reserves equivalent to 290 times its annual consumption levels (2024 data). There’s enough oil for centuries.

Even with all their military tech, Israel (15 million people) would never dare a conventional attack Iran (90 million people) in fear of retaliation from Iran’s allies and Muslims and global sanctions.

Could Iran have argued the “right” of a preemptive strike since Israel’s first a-bomb in 1970?

Where else would Israel’s atomic bombs be used but on Iran and its allies?

It’s not that Iran’s government had evil intentions, it’s that they are following the logic of mounting a nuclear arsenal as deterrent for the Israeli nuclear threat.

Coined by journalist Seymour Hersh in 1991, the “Samson Option” is Israel’s deterrence strategy of last resort, involving massive nuclear retaliation if the nation faces existential destruction, referencing the biblical figure Samson who died killing his captors, despite Israel has been the one invading the Palestinians.

Yet, the Iranians have logical reasons to believe that Israel could use them to support or even avoid conventional attack on allies, considering that the Israeli Government believes in a map of Greater Israel including neighboring territory:

Didn’t the USA nuke Japan with the fake excuse to save soldiers?

Why wouldn’t Israel nuke Iran when they are 15 million against more than billions of Muslims?

The solution to the conflict is simple:

mutual nuclear disarmament!

The problem isn’t Iran’s potential nuclear development but Israel’s actual nuclear power!

The same program that got JFK assassinated for opposing it! Is Trump afraid?

21 Jun 2025. Based on the preemptive strike doctrine, the USA bombed 3 Iranian nuclear plants. Trump on TV: “Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.” On TruthSocial: “We have completed our very successful attack … NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!”

That wasn’t enough for Satan-yahu ! He dragged Trump with their usual bribes, threats and extortion (Epstein honey-pot videos of Trump explain why he isn’t releasing the files and why no child-abuser is in jail).

Nobody believes the blatant lie that Trump was forced to support an imminent Israeli attack. What would happen to the USA if he didn’t? NOTHING! If Satan-yahu wanted to create a problem, let him fix it!

28 Feb 2026. Israel’s Operation Roaring Lion and USA’s Operation Epic Fury attacked key Iranian officials, military commanders and facilities, for regime change, violating international law, which bans intervening in internal conflicts.

The principle of non-intervention prohibits states from interfering, directly or indirectly, in the internal affairs of another sovereign state. This rule is a cornerstone of international law derived from the UN Charter and customary law. It is designed to protect a state from foreign meddling in its right to choose its own political, economic, and social system. By the way, all intel agencies (especially the CIA) were created by freemasons to circumvent this law with covert and overt operations.

Here, the term “pre-emptive strike” is just a lame excuse to hide who the aggressor really is.

Of course, there was no regime change. It was obvious that even if decapitating the whole government, a similar or even worse would arise. Any historian of the “color” revolutions knows this. What happened after Gaddafi or the Iraq war or after al-Assad leaving Syria? You don’t have to go back to the masonic French revolution against the king, leading to a masonic Emperor of war, Napoleon.

Remember how the USA went to war with Iraq because of a fake Mossad-paid informant, leading to a UK dossier taken for granted, despite all intel agencies have strict guidelines to sieve and classify the validity and trustworthiness of data? (see below)

Just as with Iraq’s inexistent nerve gas (WMDs), there were no nukes in Iran after only 8 months of complete destruction of their program: otherwise, instead of threatening to use them, they’d have actually used them in retaliation, at least, as warning against an isolated spot (to initially avoid Israeli nuclear response), at most, wiping out all Jewish cities like Tel Aviv (Jerusalem is a sacred place for Muslims). Otherwise, if they had them but would always be unable to use them in fear of retaliation by nuclear enemies (USA, Israel), why try to develop them in the first place?

Trump’s war legally ends April 29, 2026

War Powers Act says there’s only three instances when a president can go to war:

1. A declaration by Congress

2. Use of authorization of force by Congress

3. An imminent threat

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security: (it) is a 47-year-old conflict. Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don’t think the evidence is there that there was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own.

• The 60-day clock begins as soon as the president reports the deployment to Congress, or within 48 hours of deploying the forces, whichever is earlier .

• If Congress has not authorized the action by a declaration of war or specific legislation within 60 days, the President must terminate the use of armed forces .

• The 60-day limit can be extended for an additional 30 days (a 30-day “withdrawal period”) if the president certifies that “unavoidable military necessity” requires continued use of forces for safe removal .

• At any time during the 60 days, Congress can pass a concurrent resolution to direct the President to remove the troops immediately, which does not require a presidential signature.

• The first strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities occurred on June 22, 2025 (Operation Midnight Hammer). The Twelve-Day War ended in a US-brokered ceasefire on June 24, 2025, which officially terminated the “hostilities” that would have triggered a long-term War Powers clock . Once a ceasefire is established and forces are no longer engaged in active combat, any previous 60-day clock is effectively “reset” or rendered moot. The date that falls 60 days after February 28, 2026, is Wednesday, April 29, 2026. There’s no way that Trump will “win” this war before that deadline.

• President Trump and Vice President JD Vance argue that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional, because the only way this authority can be taken from the Executive Branch is by an amendment to the Constitution.

• Critics often argue that the law is designed to give Congress a firm mechanism to compel a withdrawal or force a vote on the authorization of force, which doesn’t grant a 60-day blank-check window.

Trump broke the law. He could go to jail. That’s why he’s desperate for a quick “victory”. If the Democrats regain the majority in Congress in the midterms, Trump will certainly be impeached.

WMD scam: unlearned history, repeated history

Intel information grading

AI: Intelligence agencies typically use the Admiralty System (or NATO System) to grade information. This framework evaluates the source and the information separately to prevent the bias of automatically believing a “good” source or dismissing a “bad” one.

1. The Admiralty Scale (A1–F6)

Analysts assign an alphanumeric code (e.g., B2) to every piece of intelligence based on two criteria:

Source Reliability (Alpha A–F)

This assesses the person or entity providing the information.

• A (Reliable): No doubt about authenticity or competency; history of complete reliability.

• B (Usually Reliable): Minor doubts; history of mostly valid information.

• C (Fairly Reliable): Doubts exist, but has provided valid info in the past.

• D (Not Usually Reliable): Significant doubts; occasionally accurate in the past.

• E (Unreliable): Lacks authenticity/competency; history of invalid info.

• F (Cannot Be Judged): New or unknown source with no track record.

Information Credibility (Numeric 1–6)

This assesses the truth of the specific claim, regardless of who said it.

• 1 (Confirmed): Corroborated by independent sources; logical and consistent with other data.

• 2 (Probably True): Logical and consistent, but not yet confirmed.

• 3 (Possibly True): Reasonably logical; agrees with some other information.

• 4 (Doubtful): Possible but not logical; no other supporting info exists.

• 5 (Improbable): Not logical; actively contradicted by other evidence.

• 6 (Cannot Be Judged): No basis exists for evaluation (completely novel).

2. Informant Suitability Factors

For human informants (HUMINT), agencies conduct rigorous “suitability reviews” before and during their use. Key guidelines include:

• Motivation: Determining if they are driven by money, revenge, or legal leniency.

• Vulnerability: Assessing if they are susceptible to manipulation or double-agency.

• Access: Does the informant actually have the physical or social placement to know what they claim to know?

• Corroboration: Information is often treated as a “tip” until it is cross-verified by technical means (like SIGINT) or other independent human sources.

3. Analytic Standards (ICD 203)

In the U.S. Intelligence Community, the Intelligence Community Directive 203 mandates that all analysis must:

• Distinguish Facts from Assumptions: Clearly separate raw data from the analyst’s interpretation.

• Analysis of Alternatives: Explicitly consider other explanations for the information provided.

• Express Uncertainty: Use standard terms (e.g., “High Confidence,” “Moderate Confidence”) to describe the likelihood of the assessment being correct.

Then why intel failed on WMD in Iraq?

The failure centered on an Iraqi defector code-named “Curveball” (Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi), whose claims about mobile biological weapons labs became the “backbone” of the case for war.

The breakdown in the classification guidelines mentioned earlier happened for several specific reasons:

1. Lack of Direct Access

Although masonic U.S. intelligence relied heavily on Curveball, they never directly interviewed him before the war. He was handled exclusively by the masonic German intelligence (BND), who deliberately classified him as a “blue” source—meaning they would not permit U.S. contact. This gave a lame excuse to U.S. analysts from performing their own “suitability reviews” or noticing personal instabilities.

2. Ignored Warnings and Caveats

The system failed because key warnings were filtered out before reaching top decision-makers:

• The “Burn Notice”: German handlers warned the CIA that the source was unstable and his information was “unconfirmed”.

• Analytical Skepticism: A CIA officer in Europe reportedly told his superiors the source was “crazy,” and a Pentagon analyst wrote a letter expressing concerns that Curveball’s info was being used as the “backbone” of the case despite his unreliability.

• The Response: A Deputy at the CIA reportedly responded to these concerns by saying, “The (masonic) Powers That Be probably aren’t terribly interested in whether Curve Ball knows what he’s talking about”.

3. Confirmation Bias and Groupthink

Instead of grading the information objectively (Information Credibility 1–6), analysts were “trapped by a mindset” that Saddam Hussein must have WMDs.

• Selective Evidence: Any data that supported the existence of weapons was deliberately elevated, while contradictory evidence—like UN inspectors finding no proof on the ground—was dismissed as Iraqi “denial and deception”.

• Plausibility vs. Proof: Because Curveball’s story was technically “plausible” and fit the existing narrative, it was deliberately accepted as “Probably True” even without independent corroboration.

4. Pressure for Speed

Following the false flag psy-op 9/11, the timeline for producing the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) was truncated from the usual 6–10 months to just three weeks . This rush led to a convenient “abdication of responsibility” to vet sources thoroughly, favoring speed over accuracy.

Technical Inconsistencies Overlooked

• Engineering Impossibilities: Curveball claimed mobile biological labs were housed in trucks with fermentation tanks . Experts later noted that such a process would require a massive water supply and precise temperature controls—features that were missing or physically impossible to stabilize in a moving vehicle on Iraq’s bumpy roads .

• The “Clean Room” Fallacy: He described a high-tech “clean room” for germ production inside a seed purification plant at Djerf al-Nadaf . When UN inspectors visited the site in early 2003, they found a simple grain-handling facility covered in dust and cobwebs, with no evidence of specialized equipment or decontamination systems .

• Physical Obstacles: He claimed these massive production trucks were kept in a specific two-story building that could be driven into from both sides . Satellite imagery and on-site inspections revealed a large wall blocking the path where the trucks supposedly entered, making his description physically impossible .

• Fabricated “Accidents”: He alleged a 1998 biological accident at Djerf al-Nadaf had killed 12 technicians . Intelligence agencies were later unable to find any hospital records, family reports, or burials in the region that matched such an event .

Ignored Counter-Evidence

• Direct Denials: German intelligence (BND) interviewed Curveball’s former boss, Dr. Basil Latif, who explicitly called Curveball a “liar” and noted he had no access to sensitive programs .

• Hydrogen Trailers: After the invasion, the U.S. found two trailers that looked like Curveball’s “labs” . However, technical analysis by the Iraq Survey Group later proved they were actually used to generate hydrogen gas for weather balloons to aid artillery targeting .

Despite these technical “red flags,” the Admiralty Scale grading was inflated by senior officials who wanted definitive proof rather than caveated intelligence .

Why didn’t Curveball go to prison?

Key Outcomes for “Curveball”

• Asylum in Germany: Despite his lies, Janabi was granted political asylum by the German government in 2000 . Reports indicate he lived for years in a modest flat in southern Germany and even worked at a fast-food restaurant at one point .

• Public Admission: In 2011, he admitted in interviews with The Guardian and the BBC that he had entirely fabricated the WMD claims .

• Motivation: He stated he was “proud” of his lies because they were the only way to topple Saddam Hussein’s regime and bring “a margin of democracy” to Iraq .

• Brief Detention: He claimed that after Colin Powell’s UN speech, he confronted his German intelligence handlers (BND) for sharing his unverified info. He was then allegedly placed in confinement for roughly 90 days and told not to speak, but no formal criminal charges followed .

• Legal Challenges: While some German politicians argued he should be prosecuted for “warmongering”—a crime under German law—no such legal action was ever successfully pursued .

• Political Ambitions: Interestingly, he later attempted to enter Iraqi politics from abroad, but his party received only a negligible number of votes in the 2010 elections .

Janabi’s lack of punishment is often attributed to the “embarrassment” of the intelligence agencies involved.

Conclusion

Prosecuting Curveball would have required a public trial that exposed the systemic deliberate failures of the masonic U.S., German, and British services.

It wasn’t that his lies killed millions, but that the masons looked for a liar to justify their 2003 mad war to achieve several objectives:

• Destroy a strong government, leaving a weak country, ideal for Israel (just as with all Israel’s neighbors and Muslim countries)

• Kill Christians and make them flee, leaving an even more Muslim population (exactly as it happened in Syria): Iraq’s Christian communities (Assyrians, Chaldeans, etc.) did suffer massive decline post-2003—fleeing violence, ISIS, and sectarian chaos after the power vacuum. Easier to justify a later attack on a 100% Muslim country to a self-perceived-but-not “Christian” President like Trump?

• Privatizing Iraqi oil fields for U.S./UK corporations (just as in the Venezuelan strike, and now Iran’s new desired regime)

• Currency warfare to defend the masonic Fed’s dollar reserve status, since Saddam was selling oil in other currencies.

• Divert billions in Government budget to the masonic Military Industrial Complex (n.b. Halliburton), finishing unfinished business from the 1991 Gulf War for Bush family/Cheney.

Trump skipped history class. The invasion’s human cost was enormous: hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, thousands of U.S. troops, regional destabilization leading to ISIS …

Was ISIS a masonic creation?

• Israeli-made weapons found in ISIS areas were reported by Syrian/Iranian sources.

• Conflict Armament Research and other investigations found U.S./allied-supplied arms (Bulgarian rockets, Romanian machine guns, TOWs) in ISIS caches by 2015–2016

• U.S. early support for certain Syrian rebels which later joined ISIS:

Main U.S. Programs Involved

• Timber Sycamore (CIA, ~2013–2017): Covert effort (~$1 billion/year at peak) providing weapons (including TOW missiles), training, and funding to selected Free Syrian Army (FSA) commanders and other “moderate” rebels fighting Assad. Allies like Saudi Arabia and Turkey helped channel support. Many weapons were diverted via corruption, sales, or captures.

• Syrian Train and Equip (Pentagon, 2014–2015): Aimed at creating a 15,000-strong force specifically to fight ISIS (not Assad). It was a failure, producing few fighters before cancellation.

Notable Cases of Defections or Links

• Division 30 (30th Division): A key Pentagon-trained group under the Train and Equip program. In 2015, dozens of its U.S.-trained fighters (one batch of ~54–75) were captured or defected shortly after entering Syria. Many handed over weapons and joined or aligned with al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch) in Idlib/Aleppo areas for protection or pragmatism. Al-Nusra was a rival to ISIS but shared jihadist ideology; some fighters later flowed toward ISIS or extremists. The group was quickly routed, with U.S. weapons (e.g., M240 machine guns, Mk14 rifles) paraded by Nusra. This highlighted vetting failures—many recruits were sympathetic to hardliners.

• Free Syrian Army (FSA) factions/brigades: The FSA was a loose umbrella, not a unified army. U.S. provided non-lethal aid early, then weapons/training to select units. Reports from 2013–2014 note:

  • Entire units or hundreds of fighters from FSA-linked groups defected to ISIS or Nusra, especially in Raqqa and northern Syria. One 2014 report cited ~1,000 rebels defecting to ISIS, including from FSA-nominal brigades, often for better pay, weapons, or after losing battles.

  • Examples include brigades in Raqqa province and around Aleppo. The 11th Division (FSA) reportedly pledged to Nusra. Some FSA units fought alongside ISIS temporarily against Assad (e.g., at Menagh air base in 2013) before clashes.

• Northern Storm Brigade (FSA-aligned, Azaz area): Received some Western attention/support as “moderate.”

Sounds crazy? Then read!

On November 10, 2025, President Donald Trump hosted Ahmed al-Sharaa, the new Syrian President and former leader of the Al-Qaeda Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) rebel group, at the White House for high-level talks, marking a historic shift in U.S.-Syria relations. The meeting focused on security cooperation, following the lifting of U.S. sanctions and a terrorist designation on al-Sharaa, who assumed power after the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad.

Wasn’t Al-Qaeda the enemy during the 9/11 narrative?

Still in shock? How about this:

The Government of Israel supported Hamas in the from the 1970s till the 10/7 2023 attack, allegedly as a counterweight to the secular PLO/Fatah.

Israel licensed and tolerated Mujama al-Islamiya (Islamic Center/Association), Yassin’s charity founded in 1973. It allowed the group to register as a charity (1979), build mosques (numbers in Gaza rose sharply), schools, clinics, clubs, and the Islamic University of Gaza. Some officials provided limited financial aid to mosques and Islamic institutions. Brig. Gen. Yitzhak Segev (military governor in Gaza) later admitted giving budgets to mosques to counter leftists/PLO. Avner Cohen (Israeli religious affairs official) famously said, “Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation,” referring to this enabling of the social infrastructure. Ex-officials like David Hacham later called it a mistake.

Why would Benjamin Netanyahu and others in Israeli governments gave a lot of money and allowed Qatari cash transfers to prop up Hamas governance in Gaza?

• Total Qatari funding to Gaza/Hamas: 1.8 billion from roughly 2012–2023 (or focused on 2018 onward). This includes cash, fuel, and aid.

• Monthly transfers (2018 onward): Began with $15 million in cash suitcases delivered via Israel in late 2018. Often described as $10–30 million per month (sometimes cited up to $35 million in broader aid/fuel packages). Qatar pledged $360 million annually by 2021.

• Period: Primarily 2018–2023 (pre-Oct 7). Israel coordinated logistics (e.g., suitcases through Israeli crossings/airport), with officials like Mossad and IDF involved in negotiations.

• Netanyahu’s government defended and at times encouraged increases, even shortly before Oct 7 amid tensions.

This is another evidence proving that 10/7 was another false-flag psy-op:

"10/7 = 9/11"

Call to action

In the following article there’s a guide on how to contact Congress:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/freedom-red-alert-april-19-2026

When asking them to deny Trump permission for war, take advantage to also demand the defense of freedom of speech.

9 steps out of global tyranny

Sep 10

Time after time, most have become disappointed with their political leaders, in whom they placed their hopes for change. What they don’t realize is that the root of the problem is the system:

Read full story

The PLAN revealed

This research took many many hours (including late night work), that will save you that amount of reading and organizing ideas. If you like it, please consider a paid subscription:

Read full story

Are you prepping?

They are manufacturing a the huge infrastructure and financial crisis !

20 laws we need to exit Extermination Planet

Laws to exit planet prison

No Free Speech without Reach

Why was Bill Gates the mentor of Zuckerberg?

Zuckerberg really flipping?

15 Jan

What Has Happened To Mark Zuckerberg?

Read full story

How Rumsfeld forced the approval of lethal Aspartame.

Artificial sweeteners, MSG, PFAS, Glyphosate ... go organic!

Why is food poisoning legal?

26 November 2023

This article would be another tool you could share to keep waking-up the still-trusting sleepwalkers: some reject discussing injections, but they’d be open to food.

Solutions for “this” Democracy?

Rethinking science

19 December 2023

Unless we change it, we’re doomed to the next PLANdemic. And yet, nothing has changed, only got worse! This isn’t pessimism: just a realistic call to ACTION in the medical and scientific freedom communities.

Rethinking education for the real 21^st century:

Why not earning $60,000 per year for educating your own children?

Call to action

1. Please share in social networks!

10 shares = waking up more people + especial gratitude:

Waking others up SAVES lives or livelihoods.

For example, send them free ebooks:

Turtles, all the way down!

Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak

The more the awakened, the sooner this nightmare will be over !

Share

2. Please subscribe

Scientific Progress is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, please consider becoming a free or paid subs:

3. Show your love in the tip jar =)

1 dollar makes a difference !

If you feel like saying 'thank you'

Tip Jar

4. Please consider “buy me a coffee”:

5. Please reconsider a paid subscription:

6. Please consider commissioning an article for the topic of your preference:

Commision an Article

7. Pray

Most important of all: let’s pray for each other and the conversion of our enemies !

The evil we see in the material world is just the echo from the spiritual battle between God and Satan and their followers, either human or angelic.

Darkness grows because the light of faith is fading. Faith is the root of a plant that withers without the sunlight of love and the water of prayer. God is love: ask Him for more faith in love.