The Paradox of Inferiority: An Analysis of Fulton J. Sheen’s Insight on Self-Perception
Catholic spirituality has always asked something counterintuitive of us: to wait. Not in the passive, sighing-at-a-bus-stop sense, but in that older, harder discipline of trusting that God actually governs the world, even when the evidence feels thin. And if you watch how this idea develops across the tradition, you notice the same truth resurfacing again and again. Waiting isn’t spiritual stagnation. It’s cooperation–slow, deliberate, and sometimes uncomfortable. The Church has never imagined it as resignation. It’s more like consenting to God’s pace.
You see the roots of this already in the early Church. Augustine is the great voice here, and he keeps circling back to the idea that waiting is good for the soul because it exposes its limits. He reads the Psalms the way a seasoned pastor reads human nature–gently, honestly–and he keeps pointing out that God’s delays are rarely punishments. They’re protection. When God withholds, Augustine says, it’s often because the gift would do damage if given too early. So waiting becomes a kind of interior athleticism: the strengthening of hope, the refusal to let delay tilt into despair. He even presses the point further in Psalm 27, urging believers to “quit themselves like men,” not by flexing, but by trusting that God acts without deception. For Augustine, waiting is simply what a creature does when it remembers it isn’t God.
Move into the medieval period, and the theme doesn’t disappear–it just gets lived in a more public way. The mendicants, especially the Franciscans, built their entire communal life on the practice. Francis didn’t romanticize poverty; he weaponized it against self-sufficiency. His Rule strips the brothers of everything that could numb them to their dependence on God: no property, no hoarded food, no guarantee of tomorrow’s roof. And oddly enough, this radical poverty becomes the daily school of providence. Friars wait for alms; they wait for direction; they wait for correction. Their obedience isn’t bureaucratic but theological: deferring their wills as an act of faith. In a feudal world obsessed with security, these itinerant preachers embodied the opposite, trusting that providence actually moves and expecting to move with it.
By the early modern period, the conversation shifts inward again. Francis de Sales steps into this moment with a kind of fatherly steadiness, insisting that trust in God’s providence isn’t about collapsing into passivity but rather about giving God permission to work without our constant interference. He talks about abandonment in terms of Christ’s own self-emptying, yet he keeps urging believers to act in the duties God puts in front of them. “Do what you can,” he says, and then surrender the rest. In other words, providence doesn’t excuse laziness; it tempers anxiety. Spiritual life, for de Sales, is cooperation–God tuning the soul while the soul keeps the strings from snapping.
Then the eighteenth century arrives with its passion for mastery, calculation, and control, and Catholic spirituality responds by doubling down on abandonment. Writers like Fénelon, Grou, and de Caussade all press the same point from different angles: stop trying to get ahead of God. Receive providence the way Israel once gathered manna–small portions, one day at a time, without stocking up for psychological comfort. They describe waiting in almost domestic images: a child resting in a father’s arms, a soul learning not to fidget, a heart relaxing into a will not its own. And they insist that God’s will is not a puzzle to decode but a present to receive. Their message isn’t sentimental. It’s a quiet act of rebellion against the era’s confidence in human control.
And now we arrive in the modern world–where waiting has become almost unintelligible. We binge entire shows in a night, track packages in real time, message people who seem offended if we don’t reply instantly. In this climate, Pope Francis’s reminders about vigilance and patience sound almost archaic, which is precisely why they matter. He warns against the myth of efficiency and the spiritual drowsiness that comes from sprinting through life. He keeps coming back to Simeon in the Temple–someone who didn’t let time erode expectation. Waiting, Francis argues, is a way of making room for God’s unpredictable work in a culture that prizes immediacy and measurable outcomes.
So if you zoom out and look at the whole tradition–from Augustine to the Franciscans to de Sales to de Caussade to Francis–you see one continuous argument: God’s providence is real, but its rhythm is not ours. And the only way to live inside that truth is to wait with intention. Not slumped in resignation, not clutching anxieties like broken tools, but standing in that old, demanding posture of trust.
Waiting, in other words, is how the soul learns to breathe in God’s tempo.