Immigrant or Illegal Alien? What are Catholics supposed to do?
Sponsored
Catholic365 is sponsored by
Road to Purity
Since the close of the Second Vatican Council, voices have risen to challenge its fruits. Some critiques come from sincere confusion; others from groups like the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), sedevacantist movements, or independent traditionalist publications. Often they repeat the same ten arguments, assuming the Council itself caused rupture, loss of faith, or invalid practices. But the truth is, when you read the actual documents of Vatican II — and the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM) — the story is very different.
So let’s walk through the top ten objections. I’ll show you what critics claim, why they say it, and then what the Council itself actually teaches.
1. “The Council created a rupture, a fabricated liturgy.”
Where it comes from: SSPX, Michael Davies, and traditionalist writers often cite Joseph Ratzinger’s remark about a “banal on-the-spot product.” They argue the Mass was invented by committees rather than received from tradition.
The claim: Sacrosanctum Concilium 21 spoke of a “general restoration” (instauratio), which critics read as total novelty.
The correction: SC 23: “Innovationes ne fiant nisi vera et certa utilitas Ecclesiae id exigat… novae formae… organice crescant.” — “No innovations are to be introduced unless the good of the Church genuinely and certainly requires them… new forms should grow organically from those already existing.”
Why it matters: The very council accused of rupture explicitly outlawed rupture.
2. “The Mass is no longer a sacrifice but a meal.”
Where it comes from: The 1969 “Ottaviani Intervention” and much SSPX rhetoric claim the Novus Ordo emphasizes meal over sacrifice.
The claim: SC 47 calls the Eucharist the “memorial of the Lord’s Supper.”
The correction: SC 47 continues: “…in Missa… sacrificium crucis perpetuatur” — “In the Mass the sacrifice of the Cross is perpetuated.” Lumen Gentium 3 affirms: “Sacrificium eucharisticum” — “the Eucharistic sacrifice.”
Why it matters: Both meal and sacrifice are integral, but sacrifice is primary. Vatican II preserved the theology of Trent.
3. “The reform was Protestantized for ecumenism.”
Where it comes from: Critics point to Protestant observers at the Consilium.
The claim: Unitatis Redintegratio’s call for dialogue meant doctrine was watered down.
The correction: UR 4: “Irenismus falsus vitetur” — “False irenicism must be avoided.” Lumen Gentium 8: “Ecclesia Christi subsistit in Ecclesia catholica” — “The Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church.”
Why it matters: Dialogue is not dilution. The fullness of truth remains Catholic.
4. “Vatican II desacralized the liturgy and caused abuses.”
Where it comes from: Traditionalist publications like The Remnant claim abuses stem from Vatican II.
The claim: The call for “active participation” (SC 14) emptied the Mass of awe.
The correction: SC 7: “Christus… praesens praesertim sub speciebus eucharisticis.” — “Christ is present especially under the Eucharistic species.” SC 22 §3: “Nemo… proprio marte in Liturgia addat, demat, aut mutet.” — “No one, on his own, may change the liturgy.”
Why it matters: Abuses happen when people disobey the Council, not because the Council endorsed them.
5. “Religious liberty contradicts Catholic teaching.”
Where it comes from: Integralists and sedevacantist groups oppose Dignitatis Humanae.
The claim: DH 2 affirms a civil right to religious freedom.
The correction: DH 1: “Hanc unicam veram Religionem subsistere… in Ecclesia catholica… integrum relinquit doctrinam traditionalem.” — “This one true religion subsists in the Catholic Church… [religious liberty] leaves untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the duty of men and societies toward the true religion.”
Why it matters: Civil liberty ≠ theological indifferentism.
6. “Latin and chant were abandoned.”
Where it comes from: Nearly all traditionalist critics point to today’s loss of Latin.
The claim: SC 36 §2 allowed vernacular, effectively displacing Latin.
The correction: SC 36 §1: “Linguae latinae usus… servetur.” — “The use of Latin is to be preserved.” SC 54 requires the faithful to “dicere vel cantare Latine” — “say or sing in Latin.” SC 116: “Cantus Gregorianus… principem locum obtineat.” — “Gregorian chant should have pride of place.”
Why it matters: If Latin disappeared, it is because Vatican II was ignored, not obeyed.
7. “The reform discarded the old prayers.”
Where it comes from: Critics cite Matthew Hazell’s research that only ~17% of old Collects were kept unchanged.
The claim: The Missal of Paul VI represents a wholesale break with tradition.
The correction: SC 50: “Ritus servata eorum substantia… simpliciores instaurentur.” — “The rites, while preserving their substance, are to be restored in simpler form.”
What changed:
Why it matters: The treasury was not destroyed but better arranged. With the new three-year Lectionary and wider range of prayers, the faithful now hear more of God’s Word and liturgical variety than ever before.
8. “Sacraments and Orders were jeopardized.”
Where it comes from: Sedevacantists (e.g., Fr. Cekada, CMRI) claim Paul VI’s 1968 reform invalidated Orders by suppressing “minor orders” and the subdeacon.
The claim: Without minor orders, the path to priesthood was truncated.
The correction: SC 59: “Sacramenta… gratiam conferunt.” — “The sacraments confer grace.” LG 21: episcopal consecration confers the “plenitudo sacramenti Ordinis” — “the fullness of the sacrament of Orders.”
What changed:
Why it matters: Orders are clearer now: the sacrament has three degrees — deacon, priest, bishop — just as Vatican II taught (LG 28-29). Nothing essential was lost.
9. “Versus populum proves the Mass is people-centered.”
Where it comes from: Polemics link versus populum to anthropocentrism.
The claim: Priest facing the people shifts the focus to the assembly.
The correction: GIRM 146, 157, 165 direct the priest to face the people at specific moments: “stans versus populum… Oráte fratres”; “versus ad populum… Ecce Agnus Dei”. This only makes sense if his ordinary posture is toward the altar with the people.
Why it matters: Orientation is God-centered. Versus populum is permitted, not mandated.
10. “Vatican II was pastoral only; we can ignore it.”
Where it comes from: Sedevacantists and some “recognize-and-resist” circles.
The claim: Since no new dogmas were proclaimed, Vatican II is optional.
The correction: LG 25: “Romanum Pontificem… religiosum voluntatis et intellectus obsequium.” — “To the Roman Pontiff the faithful owe religious submission of will and intellect.” This includes conciliar teaching.
Why it matters: To dismiss Vatican II is to dismiss the Magisterium.
Extras
Nostra Aetate 2: “Ecclesia nihil eorum quae vera et sancta sunt in his religionibus reicit… Christum… annuntiat.” — “The Church rejects nothing true and holy in other religions… yet she proclaims Christ.” Dialogue ≠ relativism.
SC 33: the priest prays “ad Deum, nomine totius plebis” — “to God, in the name of the whole people.” Participation ≠ desacralization.
The Witness of the Popes
Let us not forget:
Three of these four popes — John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II — are canonized saints. What does this say? It says the Holy Spirit confirmed the Council’s work through the lives of holy pastors. Saints do not build on error.
The Real Problem
When we place Vatican II and the Mass under the light of their own words, the criticisms collapse. The Council preserved sacrifice, continuity, sacredness, Latin, chant, and binding doctrine. Abuses and confusion did not come from the Council but from people ignoring it.
The answer is not to reject Vatican II or the Mass of Paul VI, but to live them as the Church intended. Then the true face of Catholic worship shines again: Christ present, sacrifice renewed, the faithful gathered in reverence and truth.
So next time someone says, “Really? Vatican II ruined everything,” you can answer: “Really? Show me. Rather, let me show you.”
God Bless
Deacon Wally was born and raised in Michigan. In 1987 he joined the United States Marine Corps. Originally, he was not planning on making a career with the Corps, however as time moved on, Calabrese spent 20 years on active duty and retired in 2007 as a Gunnery Sergeant. During his time in the Corps and while stationed overseas in Okinawa Japan, he met his bride, Amy. They married on April 11, 1992, and were blessed with two daughters, Lori (Thomas) and Leeza (Kevin). Both daughters are married and have children. Upon retirement from the Marine Corps, Calabrese began working for the local community college as the campus chair. Calabrese spent 13 years with the college and decided to leave full-time work to pursue writing and speaking extensively. Deacon Wally was ordained to the diaconate June 26, 2010. He was in the second class for the Diocese of Raleigh. Upon ordination, Calabrese was assigned to Annunciation Parish in Havelock, NC. Calabrese authored The Apostles and Me! Deacon Wally also has authored booklets titled, Confirmed and Ready! and Living a Catholic and Moral Life. Calabrese has a passion for spreading the great love of Christ and the Catholic Faith. Deacon Wally earned his bachelor's degree from Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, and he holds a master's degree in Pastoral Theology from St. Joseph’s College, Standish, ME. For more information on Deacon Wally Calabrese please visit his website: www.deaconwallycalabrese.com
