Distinguishing people from events

As same sex marriages in America have become civically blessed, business owners who provide wedding-related services or venues are more and more being asked to provide their services or venues to aid same-sex couples as they plan their celebration. Often, such business owners, who refuse to provide their services to same-sex couples for this event, are met with hatred, derision, and sometimes lawsuits for their choice not to participate in this single event.

I want to speak to those who hold such antagonistic views. I want to say it's an event the service providers are objecting to, not the people. I want to ask a question many will find offensive and stop reading, caring little for why I asked. I want to ask, would you be ok with the owners refusing to provide their services to a black mass?

A black mass, as I understand it, is a satanic ritual designed to call forth demons, desecrate a concentrated host, and so many other unspeakable acts of disrespect. Should Catholic business owners be allowed to refuse to provide their venue or services to aid in the celebration of that event?

I ask not because I see a same sex marriage as the same as a black mass, but rather as a way to determine the priority the answering person places on religious freedom. When looking at both a satanic mass and a same-sex wedding, there are only four possible answers to the question:
1) business owners should be allowed to refuse to provide services to a satanic black mass, but not allowed to refuse to provide services to a same-sex wedding;
2) business owners should be allowed to refuse to provide services to a same-sex wedding, but not allowed to refuse to provide services to a satanic black mass;
3) business owners should not be allowed to refuse to provide services to either a satanic black mass or a same-sex wedding; or
4) business owners should be allowed to refuse to provide services to either.

Regardless of the answer provided, the follow up question is why?

If the answer is one, the religious beliefs of the owners matter more than the religious practices of the satanic black mass hosts, but less than the wedding of those seeking a same-sex marriage.

If the answer is two, the religious beliefs of the owners matter more than the wedding of the same-sex couple, but not more than the religious practices of the satanic black mass hosts.

If the answer is three, then the religious beliefs of the business owners are subordinate to both events.

If the answer is four, the religious beliefs of the business owners are paramount over both events.

I can't think of any other answers to the question, or ways to describe the answers. Lawmakers will have to decide which stance makes the most sense in the law. For Catholics, we already know.

In Dignitatis Humanae, available online at http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html, the Catholic Church teaches that each individual should be allowed to practice their own religion in ways acceptable to them.

Paragraph two states in part that, "...the human person has a right to religious freedom. This freedom means that all men are to be immune from coercion on the part of individuals, social groups, and of any human power, in such wise as no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs, weather privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due limits."

Applying this Catholic Church teaching to the question at hand, the answer seems to be the fourth option-allowing the business owner to refuse. No one is forcing the same-sex couple to act a certain way or believe something they are opposed to - that would be unacceptable. So, too, it should be unacceptable for government, society, or individuals to force the Catholic business owner to participate...providing a venue, food, flora, etc...in a same-sex wedding, should the business owners object on religious grounds.