Since When Does Habitual Mortal Sin Constitute A New Human Species?

The whole world has gone nuts about this sin. Satan must be giving bonuses to the inventors of this plan to make insanity actually believable to so much of the world. My Catholic schooled 16-year-old-nephew is not going to Holy Communion because "He does not want to contribute to the meanness of the Catholic Church in not letting homosexuals get married." If you are a sane, practicing Catholic you should not even hint that this issue of not allowing two women or two men to ‘marry’ is at all sensitive, controversial or based on someone's subjective opinion.

Homosexual behavior is gravely sinful, disordered and obviously not as God biologically planned. Homosexual actions do not define a person nor do they constitute some new sort of human being. God did not create a new species called "Gay" or "Homosexual" but he did create the species of human beings that pro-create via heterosexuality. Those who engage in this destructive sinful behavior were not 'born' with this ‘special’ identity which is romantically elaborated in the book, “Loving Someone Gay. “ This accepted-as-fact was made-up more than 35 years ago in an actual ‘Planning Meeting’ with homosexually active men and women in the Los Angeles area. I know this because I was a tag-along guest and heard it all with my own ears and witnessed this with my own eyes. I heard a lot more than just “we were born this way” in that meeting and it is truly breathtaking how each and every agenda item has exploded into the unimagined success that could not even be hoped for by the staunchest promoters at that meeting.

There is no evidence of DNA and there is no genetic link to this plain old concupiscence. There is some excitement in a small branch of the scientific community because after countless research studies that have never come up with a DNA link, no homosexual gene, there might be a controversial something called epigenetic marks related to sensitivity to hormones in the womb. I am sure it would be exciting after failing to have one shred of scientific anything that could possibly make the arbitrary wishful thinking that might suggest that there is any truth to “I was born Gay” or worse, “God created me Gay.” It is just another desperate hope that will be promoted as science in our gone-mad world.

One primary truth that should be acknowledged before even beginning to argue against the truth of this classic rationalization is that the label “Homosexual” should never have been employed to define a person. That was another highly successful agenda item. Homosexual can only be used to describe someone's disordered behavior or disordered desires. Using the term, “Gay” or even “Homosexual” gives consent to the made-up notion that this is another kind of human, a “special” human being that we should “celebrate” as I have seen used by ‘Catholic’ promoters of this plain old deadly sin. And, I do not use that term lightly, but rather, I use it literally.

I know that our upside down culture loves to interchange terminology for sins according to whatever or whomever needs some assurance that “anything I do is OK” or “anything that I am addicted to is a disease.” Any clear-thinking Catholics should be able to recognize and not back down from stating and knowing truth; it has been black and white throughout the millennium. Truth is, has been, and always will be OBJECTIVE. And, this is not an opinion, but I will post about that dictator called, “Moral Relativism” in other articles. The interchanging of the “conditions” or the “diseases” or the various “isms” for the plain old list of serious sins is a very fruitful tactic for temporarily assuaging the pricked conscience. Any person reading this can probably relate to the statement that I most definitely can attest to: ALL SIN IS ADDICTING.

Part of the fight against sin on the path of holiness is to root out habitual sin and to guard against even committing venial sins because all vice becomes a habit. So why do we now call habitual sins like drunkenness, gluttony, sloth, greediness, vain pride, lust, avarice, disobedience, rebellion and any manner of habitual self-indulgence a disease spelled out in the DSM-IV Codes. But wait, I personally remember as a PA student in 1977 hearing the announcement of the absolute victory declared when the mental health code no longer labeled homosexual actions and attractionas “Mental Illness.” Wow, this was the necessary obstacle that had to be removed before beginning the full agenda to declare that now we aren’t even calling this habitual sin a disease, it is now a chosen “Alternative Lifestyle.” You see, that new term was yet another one of those agenda items, simply made-up.

As an aside factoid, I think that most people today do not realize that the term “Homophobic” actually was made up to mean “All heterosexuals are really afraid of their own homosexual attractions.” The plan to use the term ‘homophobic’ was never meant to be promoted as “being afraid OF homosexually active people.” This is another self-promoted delusion of those who desire to justify their habitual bondage to perverted sexual appetites. The implication was meant to say that all people have same sex attraction and that they are ‘afraid to let it loose’ by not oppressing homosexually active persons. I think that this subtle meaning was lost over the years but hey, it worked really well anyway. By-the-way, you don’t hear about the very effective results of spiritual conversion that have changed many who were trapped in this sin to live completely happy, fully functioning lives as heterosexuals. This is a much persecuted group.

My point of saying that homosexual action is not a creation of a new species by God is for the sake of MERCY. Yes, you read that correctly. The Spiritual Works of Mercy are never fun, not like the fun Corporal Works of Mercy. Mercy is defined as having compassion for or alleviating the misery of another. Feeding someone is merciful because you do not want them to suffer starvation and death of the mortal body. But admonishing a sinner has eternal effects. Not admonishing, which is condoning another’s miserable soul-killing sin, is far more important. The loss of one’s soul is incalculable destruction for eternity. Just typing that gives me chills, as it always does when I talk about the possibility and likelihood of an unrepentant sinner gay-ly rushing over the cliff into the abyss. Is it mean to save someone’s soul? Is it nice to encourage those people who KNOW that they are seriously sinning by pretending that it is just living out who God created them to be? I propose that every support group, therapist, PFLG parent, legislator, progressive pastor, supportive sibling, ‘rights’ group, or sympathetic person is simply nailing the coffin shut from Eternal Life. This is so NOT NICE. It is much, much worse than murder.

All of this insanity of ‘Gay Rights’ could not be this successful in the face of logic and reality, were there not supernatural assistance underlying this explosion of promotion of such a deadly life of sin. The Holy Spirit cannot reside in the soul of a person who has not repented of mortal sin. The saints of old made no bones about saying that when the Holy Spirit leaves, as in no longer abiding in a state of grace, then it is not left empty. This is the vulnerability for any unrepentant serious sinner. How can a person giving in to the habitual sin of homosexual action acknowledge the guilt that he or she DEFINITELY feels when there is a fantasy bubble surrounding them that prevents them from taking the first step toward Mercy? Everyone playing along in this deadly charade keeps the guilt assuaged. And this kind of guilt needs to be soothed for each time anyone even thinks that it is the grave sin that it is; hence “Gay Rights” was created.

Guilt for wrongdoing is what God mercifully hardwired into his weak children so that they would not be lost. Guilt cannot really be resolved without the steps necessary to obtain Mercy:

1. I did it – this step is what support for this sin obliterates; no mercy if no sin
2. I am sorry for wrong doing
3. I turn away with all my heart
4. I ask for forgiveness
5. I ask God for everything I need for permanent repentance

So, is it nice for any Catholic to encourage, or avoid making uncomfortable, any child of God who is living in such bondage or to act as if this ‘choice’ is something other than the sure way of perdition?