Was Someone's Sister Dissected Alive to Develop COVID Vaccines? (Part 2 of 3) [Virtual Eternity (the Serialized Novel) Episode 33]

The COVID vaccine mandates and the right to religious exemption required millions of us to question whether or not science could have pushed COVID vaccines to market at warp speed if not for abortions. Some of us found religious objections not only because babies died, but also because of how they died.

We research and discern this for fear of being fired or for fear of permanent harm by experimental vaccines. What would have driven us to research and discern this decades ago, before it all became new-normal? Could we have known years ago the likelihood that vaccines depended on cruel experimentation on babies? If so, why did we miss it?

This is Episode 33 of the serialized version of the novel, Virtual Eternity: An Epic 90s Retro Florida Techo-Pro-Life Love Story and Conversion Journey. These 52 episodes are presented here free for you every Friday. You can buy the paperback version from Mike Church’s Crusade Channel Store (at a lower price than Amazon!).

Or you can start reading at the Table of Contents: here

Part 1: Was She Outside and Alive When They Got Her Cells?

The Medical Research Library Episode Two: Extracting cells

(Why Did They Need My Sister’s Living, Healthy Cells for Vaccines?)

An hour later, we agreed we needed even more time. We decided to meet up every hour to check in, but to keep looking.

At one break a few hours later, as hunger and vending-machine-snack sugar crashes almost collapsed us, we met at the carrel with another set of papers and journals.

“Okay, this time I hit paydirt, so I’ll go first,” I said. “I discovered why they use the kidney material, and why the doctor-tennis player guy mentioned future vaccines. In 1936, this polio researcher, Sabin was his name, was one of the first. In this journal here, he wrote that they used fetuses’ organs to, um, culture the polio virus so that the virus would grow. Then they could introduce it into people to inoculate them. He said they used three-to-four-month-old embryos from C-sections. They got their kidneys, livers, spleens, brains, and spinal cords.⁶ So, at my mom’s university, it appears that doctor got my sister’s cells from her kidneys so that they can make vaccines grown in cells derived from her own cells.”

“Wait,” Maureen said. “If they grow viruses in babies’ cells to cultivate them for vaccines, are parts of those babies getting in the vaccines?”

“And what damage does that do to people? I hope scientists are asking those questions. There’s more. Here’s a paper from 1962, and another one from 1965, both by the same vaccine researcher, Hayflick, this one in a journal called Experimental Cell Research. In this paper, he verified that the ‘embryos’ came from abortions, about three months old.”⁷

“So how did they make sure the embryos’ cells didn’t die out?”

“I’m getting to that. First, more about the ‘why.’ I dug up a couple papers about the process. One was published in 1973, the other in 1977 in the Journal of General Virology. The experiments happened in the Netherlands. Very technical. They were written by this scientist named Graham.^8,9 The student I met before helped explain it. In theory, they can make those cells divide and divide forever. So my sister’s kidney cells replicated over and over. Maybe even to this day. But to start it and make it work, researchers need dozens and dozens of babies’ cells, and who-knows-how-many babies.”^10,11

“Definitely,” Maureen said. “They did that for the Rubella vaccine. I found this paper in the American Journal of Diseases of Children, by the godfather of the vaccine, Plotkin. He said it took him twenty-seven fetuses to get the cells he needed.¹² And never forget, they try to take all those cells from live babies.

“They also talked to Dr. Plotkin in a session they documented in a journal in 1969,” she continued. “Get this: they asked him point-blank about the health of the embryo’s siblings and whether they are quote-unquote ‘normal.’ He stated, here, that the parents are alive, married, in Sweden, and that they felt they ‘had too many children.’ Anyway, he said they had no family history of disease, or cancer.¹³ But why did they ask him that? And why did your father’s tennis player-doctor friend ask how you turned out?”

She pulled out another copy. “In this 1970 paper from Nature, the scientists pointed out upfront that they developed a cell line from the lung tissue of a little boy who was fourteen weeks from conception. They said he was ‘removed’ from a woman for ‘psychiatric reasons,’ whatever that means. But they wrote that she had normal genes and no ‘neoplastic’ disease, even three years later.¹⁴ Neoplastic disease is cancer.

“Here’s another one,” she continued. “It’s from the journal Science, from 1977. The paper talked about how the baby had sixteen weeks of gestation, was seven centimeters long, and was healthy. They made sure to detail the mother’s extensive blood workup, which was normal. Then they took out the boy’s lungs and put them in petri dishes.”¹⁵

“That all fits with what I read.” I pointed to the text I had circled. “In 1976, this researcher in the Journal of Biological Standardization talked about that same thing here. He said his purpose was to make vaccines. On the first page, he wrote about the babies’ healthy genetic family history. Then he talked about ‘recent inquiries’ into whether malignancy occurred in the surviving family.”¹⁶

“Hmm, ‘surviving.’ Like you. But why did that doctor ask about you?”

“Because these cell lines were built to last forever. So they wanted to get rid of imperfections. But of course, they can’t live forever. Meanwhile, we depend on them more and more, so the need for more fetuses grows and grows.”

I thumbed through a stack. “Here’s one more example of them capturing cells and keeping them alive. According to the Canadian Journal of Medical Science, this hospital in Canada, Toronto General, did it in the early 50s. The fetuses were two-and-a-half-to-five months from conception, to borrow your term. The paper described how they put them in a container and drove them to a lab at another hospital. It said no ‘macerated…’”

“Wait, what does that mean?”

“Oh, I asked that student what that means. He said it means wet or deteriorated. The skin starts peeling away after the baby is dead a few hours.”

Maureen winced. “That’s like what I read in one of the basic Ob/Gyn texts about why they can’t use miscarried fetuses for getting cells. When a baby is miscarried, the mother’s body takes anywhere from a few days to a few weeks to push out the deceased baby.”

“Exactly. No miscarriages or deteriorated babies can be used for getting tissue. Here he said that when they reached the other lab, the heart was still beating. So, again, the babies were alive when they took the tissue. Later, he confirms the purpose: virus growth in the kidney tissue. And that it worked. In the discussion part, he summarized why: to develop vaccines.”¹⁷

“So how did they preserve the living tissue cells for years?”

“Almost there. I asked that biology student for a layman’s description of that and the Netherlands experiments. I told him to explain it to me as if I was a ten-year-old child. He said they want babies’ cells, because they naturally live longer. Much longer. Once they’ve captured those cells, like I said, they want them to divide and divide, for decades. So, to answer your question, apparently to keep the cells from dying quickly, which they would normally do, and to make the cells live for the longest possible time, researchers give them genes that stimulate cancer, so the cells generate in a similar way to tumors.”¹¹

“What?”

“Yes. Apparently, that cell growth is why they were all so concerned about family history of cancer and malignancy.”

“To say that’s disturbing is an understatement,” Maureen said. She flipped through her stack and pulled out a copy of the same paper I had. “By the way, did you notice that polio researcher you mentioned, Sabin, got the embryos from Bellevue, in New York?”⁶

“Yeah.”

“The psychiatric hospital. Back then, abortions were illegal, but sterilizations were okay, on what they considered feeble-minded or crazy. So they probably looked the other way when their abortions happened.”

Maureen lofted that paper onto the table. “So now we know for sure your sister was outside when she died. And they needed her kidney cells to be defect-free, so they could become immortal, so they could divide and divide. This is so they could use them for years and years.”

“Maureen, do you mind if we stay here a bit longer? My next question is: what happened to her when they extracted the cells from her?”

“Okay. But I’ll need some more of those 3-D tortilla chips. See you in an hour. Oh, can I use your article about the not-macerated babies? I’ve got more not-so-dumb questions about that one.”

Next week: How Did They Prolong My Sister’s Life Until Dissection, and Did She Feel Pain?

Bonus: Does the End Justify the Means?

References

6. Albert B Sabin and Peter K. Olitsky, “Cultivation of Poliomyelitis Virus in vitro in Human Embryonic Tissue,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, Volume 34, p. 358, April 1, 1936

7. Leonard Hayflick, “The Limited In Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cell Strains,” Experimental Cell Research, Volume 37, p. 615, 1965

8. F. L. Graham, J. Smiley, W. C. Russell, and R. Nairn, “Characteristics of a Human Cell Line Transformed by DNA from Human Adenovirus Type 5”, Journal of General Virology, Volume 36, p. 59-74, July 1977

9. Frank L Graham, Current Contents, “This week’s citation classic,” November 14, 1988, [Online] Available from: http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1988/A1988Q713500001.pdf

10. Christian Hacking, Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform UK, “What the HEK?!,” February 9, 2021, [Online] Available from: https://www.cbruk.org/what_the_hek

11. John-Henry Westen and Pamela Acker, “’A hill worth dying on’: Expert explains how aborted baby cells taint COVID vaccines,” Lifesite News, January 21, 2021, [Online] Available from: https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/a-hill-worth-dying-on-expert-explains-how-abortedbaby-cells-taint-covid-vaccines/

12. S.A. Plotkin, J.D. Farquhar, M. Katz, “Attenuation of RA 27/3 Rubella Virus in WI-38 Human Diploid Cells”, American Journal of Diseases of Children, Volume 110, p. 178, August 1969

13. G . Sven, S. Plotkin, and K. McCarthy, “Gamma Globulin Prophylaxis; Inactivated Rubella Virus; Production and Biological Control of Live Attenuated Rubella Virus Vaccines,” American Journal of Diseases of Children, Volume 118, p. 377-378, August 1969

14. J.P. Jacobs, C.M. Jones, and J.P. Baille, “Characteristics of a human diploid cell designated MRC-5,” Nature, Volume 227, p. 168, 1970

15. W. Nichols, et al., “Characterization of a New Human Diploid Cell Strain, IMR-90,” Science, Volume 196, p. 60, April 1977

16. J.P. Jacobs, “The status of human diploid cell strain MRC-5 as an approved substrate for the production of viral vaccines”, Journal of Biological Standardization, Volume 4, p. 97-99, 1976

17. Joan C. Thicke, Darline Duncan, William Wood, A E. Franklin, and A.J. Rhodes, “Cultivation of Poliomyelitis Virus in Tissue Culture: Growth of the Lansing Strain in Human Embryonic Tissues,” Canadian Journal of Medical Science, Volume 30, p. 231-243, 1952

Copyright © 2022 Christopher Rogers.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or by any information storage retrieval system without the written permission of the author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.

This book is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, and incidents are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to any actual events or localities or persons, living or dead, is entirely coincidental.